Public works departments
Crossing Register
Which crossings the field crew drives to this quarter, in what order along which road — and which crossings the state already inspects on a filed cycle so the agency does not pay to re-inspect them.
$8
Delivered while you wait.
Type an address, get the finished PDF. No site visit, no
appointment, no queue.
Run it on an address
See a real one →
What is on it
20 lines, three maps and charts, and one page of answers. Anything we cannot answer for a property says so rather than being left blank.
Jurisdiction and county subdivision
County and county code
Boundary year
Structures listed, minimum count
Structure list with locations and identifiers
Culverts, counted separately from bridges
Condition rating by structure class
Structures rated Poor
Median year built, and oldest structure
At-grade rail crossings in the boundary
Watershed name and code
Nearest named stream and distance to it
Downstream receiving water
Design storm depth at the return interval
Hydrologic soil group and drainage class
Impervious surface around the crossing
Developed, forest and wetland shares nearby
Daily traffic and truck share on the road
Upstream high-hazard dams in poor condition
Permitted discharge points and their receiving waters
What it is not
- It never says a crossing is undersized, failing, blocked, or needs replacement.
- It never ranks, scores, triages or prioritises crossings by risk.
- It never asserts that a location has no crossing.
- It never presents itself as a census or a complete asset inventory.
- It never presents FEMA BLE depth as regulatory, and never presents an NBI 'Poor' rating as 'unsafe' — both sentences are printed in the table cell, not in a footnote.
- It reports no pipe diameter, span, rise, material, invert elevation, cover depth, sediment depth or blockage.